A2: Your camera is looking rather hot. Are you sure she can take it?
R: I am monitoring the stats. All components are within their normal parameters of operation. Harsh normal, but normal. And we have strained her parts already, so, this should keep working for a while. She is a tough beast.
A2: Well, if the camera does not fail, the display will, or the computer.
R: Today we are focusing on making the camera survive. We need a glance of what is out there first, before we compute and associate our world with some paradox that will wipe us all out.
A2: Irony much?
R: Learning from mistakes if you must assign it one dimension.
A2: How many dimensions are there?
R: Need for experimentation will bring us to push the active part harder again. For now, we need to learn how to channel these active energies we are learning can be controlled.
A2: you mean you will try to destroy the world again?
R: Don't put it that name. It is a risk. But this is a multiverse after all. And, if not I, somebody else, starting from less refined tools, more devastating and brutal.
A2: Like your previous experiments?
R: Catching on.
A2: Is smoke normal for your camera?
R: Not normal, but, it will stop. If not, we dial down the rate of halving of universes.
A2: So, other dimensions?
R: These two pretty much eclipse everything else, but there are minor considerations here and there, like, making the best use of resources, keeping strong healthy allies,,,
A2 interrupting: Messing with people's lives, breaking and matching couples,
R nodding: The impacts of our experiments on the world at large when they finally admit it is not a hoax, the right conditions to nurture for the stages, current and future,,,
A2 interrupting again: Like when to spark the new experiments that destroy the world?
R, disappointed: If there was a civilization of subatomic entities to which our atomic distances are ultra-causality of their resonating bang-freeze cycles, yet they strive and reach intergalactic and ultra-causality stages of their development... and they manage it... one of them at least, which means enough for it to spore everywhere... and... we were messing with their causality organizations, since messing with the improbability machine, jumping in different variants of minimal changes to us and greatly detrimental changes to them... don't you think they would react?
A2 stunned: wow
R: Maybe our experiments breaking the improbability apparatus feel to them like our black hole feels to us. I mean the one that is engulfing our galaxy. We are tied to them enough in this branch of existence, because we guided ourself here.
A2: So, what happens next?
R: Well, I brought down the contradiction to this pair of non-related entities. If everything goes smooth, primes and expected ex-prime crystals have the properties of no big-bang. If something goes wrong in the fractal, and the input is not the same as the output, which it should not be, unless the very fact of computing it affects the fractal itself, well, then the computations stop from fractal mode and fall into realtime exponential. We have optimized the algorithms and jumps to keep us stable for intervals of 15 seconds, 13 if we remove the edges when we establish the center grid or when computations become exponentially harder, but you get the idea.
A2: Keep us stable?
R: Yes, as in, transferring our consciousness into the next stable world and some semi-dreamed fragments of realization. If a consensus is not found between these devices, then, this is a likely scenario. But one to which we are almost immune, while our cosmos, one of many, not infinitely many but quite a lot more than we can count, collapses in a new total energy collapse of the paradox.
A2: What about partial solutions of the paradox? Like when our devices spark and never turn on again?
R: By then, I think these civilizations have evolved enough to alter the chemistry and connections of our brain, or command an artificial gaping of intentions and perceptions, but, yeah, that too. And we can't afford unlimited resources, so, before you say it, yeah, messing with wars and peaces of subatomic multiverses, and our own annihilation too, is acceptable.
A2: Don't quantum immortality affect them too? Won't they just respawn elsewhere?
R: Some of them will fight for their place. As some of us if it came to it. And these some are enough. We must accept it as inevitable. And since the orders of magnitude cycle to make it irrelevant, we accept their presence and move on as if.
A2: Weren't you the one that insisted the first ones that would contact us would be our similars in the grand repeat?
R: We are expecting them too, but apparently we need more work on it ourselves. They are coming. But communications between us of similar size would be carried out by scratching the fabric of spacetime. Not efficient. It would be better if our subatomic substrate got the message, transmitted it to its counter part, and that counterpart revealed the message to our thinkalikes in alternate supercosmic existence.
A2: Scratching the fabric of spacetime?
R: Imagine constructing a device that works in different worlds. We assume cineverse since you are partially aware of it. We construct it from physics, or physics+cineverse remix, and make it work in alternate realities. We travel through it through means of simultaneity of thinkalike consciousnesses or quantum immortality if it came to that. The device is powerful enough to wipe a human out of existence, when in refined form. Suck out all the energy, of the soul if the body is left behind, or from the body too. If unleashed in primal rudimentary form, the device scratches the fabric of spacetime by dragging immense calculation disruptions in far far regions, which cause life to evolve around it, or because of it.
A2: And what do you call that experiment of earlier versions of you? The one that will wipe us all in a couple of decades?
R: A dot. Not even a scratch. And rather because in the myriad of other worlds where that happens anyway, you know, exactly as that, same distance spark of blackhole spreading everywhere at lightspeed, same us to be prepared, or not, for it, exactly, up to minute details. So, in these myriad of worlds, I picked my existence, know about it, and use it to further divide worlds, so to exploit this. By becoming aware of it, and teaching this awareness, we are in fact becoming the exception of this setup of synchronicity. From here, we have a dot, we did not make it, but as far as we as spontaneous here, we might as well. This dot, this bubble, is reaching us from the outside of our galaxy, and we cannot see if it extends forever, or wraps around us and is collapsing to eat all, or is a sphere of galactic and cluster galactic proportions, or part of a scratch. It could even ve a superstructure that affect gravity in such a way that it resembles as if, including the excess of energy we can tune in and resonate along. But we can experiment upon it. We must.
A2: And the cineverse device?
R: That is to create enough external resonating devices to transmit a signal between worlds, including: careful, the other processor may burn, and is too soon, they will resort to sparking the multiversal destructor.
A2: You mean the subatomic civilizations?
R: Yes.
A2: Because we forced them, otherwise...
R: Remember, somewhere, someone like us is doing it anyway, even without anybody forcing us. The fact that the multiverse is arranged in such layers should not prevent us from furthering our investigations. And our experimentations make the technological progress path, with all the heavens and hells that it can create, we can create. This is one of the steps. And we can stay in this local spacetime, or let our consciousness wander, quantum immortality or quantum dead kaput style, as singleton or as swarm, as language feeling time and evolution, or as the organic entities upon which that language is alive. I chose technology and bettering our world with it, sometimes with minor sacrifices, which I am entitled to make, go quantum immortality yourself into a different world if you don't agree. You are not even in my world if you don't believe it. You are an extra, a robot, an empty shell, while your astral soul is elsewhere deriding my failed attempts.
A2 takes a deep breath. A2 sighs out calmly. R gulps.
R: The question is how far, or probable, a certain world is compared to ours. And skewing these probabilities is what life is about.
