Thursday, December 22, 2016

#BAUniC-movie-scene042

Scene:

A2 shown on the back, standing on a green wall, where a door will be overlaid, and an arm raising as if from A2, and an wrist flipping the hand for a *knock knock*. The arm/hand may as well be of A2's back/body actor, but the scene shows the ease of swapping parts so the audience gets familiarized with the new parts and a smooth change of actors for the same character may occur. A2 may move a little if needing to expose some bits of face/nose/eye attached to the back actor and the sponsored clothing, as the audience gets acquainted with those so they don't feel foreign when exposed without the complementary parts of the A2 character.

Door opens, shown from A1 inside, dressed in the kinky yet semi-formal outfit as semi-sponsored by the kink semi-shop 'Mace Roje'.

A2: Heeey... what's up?
A1: Cheers! Welcome in!
*they fist bump as seen from the camera angle that does not need 2 actors on the scene at all before being montaged in 2 characters greeting like that*
*A2 comes in. They sit.*
A1: So, what's up?
A2: R is dreaming of spaceships that are not isolated to the observed fractal but are connected to the seed we used when that spark that burned processors came. And is preparing the ground for it, with several steps of unconfirmed or possibly never confirmable jumps needed to reach that. Lucky he is not being devoted to the task in the usual obsessive way. And that is most of what is up. Everything else is small talk in comparison.
A1: Yeah, word of that reached me too, despite the blockade.
A2: How long will the internet be blocked in this house?
A1: We are instructed to not think about it. And it makes sense. This is a purge of a partial line of thoughts. When the conditions are right, we will get on to that again.
A2: Riiight... this won't be like TV, gone for good.
A1: I have never been in here at the time of TV, but then I was detaching from it already before meeting M1 and M2.
*J2 comes in, clothed in 'Mace Roje's' chosen sponsored outfit, politely bowing to A1 and A2*
A1: Would you like something to drink or nibble upon?
A2: The internet is way more useful, though. And as far as I know, nobody in this household is addicted to it or abusing it.... um, *to J2*... you got tea?
*J2 nods quietly*
A1 to J2: Tea for me too... (*J2 nods, takes 3 steps back, turns and goes* *to A2: True, we can keep ourselves in check, without the need for spanking or any form of productive punishment. But we need cleansing for a better control, easier. It would be independence. And this comes from me, free spirit, full of choice, including these *shows off his wrist cuffs. Needs audio for padlocks clacking as cuffs are displayed. A2 looks curiously, intended to inspire the audience into a sense of liking the product displayed*. Pure leather and steel. If I was chained to a tree and left there, I would end up like those cartoony skeletons. There are more chances of breaking the tree than these being chewed up, or forced away. Rain or sun. Ice or wind. Even with a sharp knife or saw, and free hands, it would take a few hours to cut the leathery part off. The steel underneath, nope, not even thinking about it.
A2: Going too far to remove the temptation of escape if those are locked in place?
A1: They were chosen for the combination of comfort AND durability, more towards the comfort part since we are still chaining humans with these. Or has any of you managed to get contact with aliens and has not told us?
A2: Or demons from overlaying worlds... nope... not as far as I know.
A1: Anyway, abrupt interruption of some routines and dependences makes us grow stronger. And at this time we are enjoying the increased focus. This is not a prison, even if we are not allowed to leave. And we can defy instructions, at least when not tied up.
A2: And how are your owners?
A1: M1 got a bit of back pain, again, but keeps the medication at minimum, as usual. M2 is fine. Working.
*J2 comes in, holding a tray. Brings it forth to A1 first. A1 takes the tea and nods approvingly. J2 moves to A2*
A2: And the rest of the bunch?
*A2 takes the tea, smiles: Thank you dear...
*J2 goes and sits in a corner, tower position, palms face up. Acts as a decoration on the scene for the rest of the conversation*
A1: We are all good. J2 is making the rest of us feel bad for not keeping up in training... I am in charge till M1 comes. Everybody is keeping healthy and sharp, and clear minded when we need to be just as well as cloudy exploration of hypothetical realities. Scheduling norm, excess and absence.
*J comes in in the meanwhile. A1 waves.*
A2: Oh, hai! What's up?
J: Great! And you?
A2: Also great, well, mostly well, but ups and downs are part of life no?
A1: Was just telling A2 about our own scheduled ups and downs.
J, clearly to A2: Good to hear, bro! (maybe a wink here, depending on the intended subtlety of the innuendo).
A2: I am always a little afraid when you call me 'bro'.
A1: He knows.
J: That's why it is fun teasing you, though I meant it sincerely.
A2: You always mean it sincerely for the most part of the reasons that guide you to use that word.
J: Hehe, true.
A2: Any progress in the search for aliens?
*J, a bit restless, looks at A2, then A1, then A2 again: Not much. Fixing a few exponential escapes beyond the probability range of consistency, and optimizing a few functions here and there. Otherwise the same bunch of blobs and dots. It cannot even be called struggling for survival. Accumulation of what we can name 'energy', and subsequential consumption of that, or critical point and division.
A2: I know you are not after creatures less complex than a virus...
A1: A virus is part of an ecosystem, it is a cog in something much more complex.
J: And these are part of a fractal, much bigger than the tiny specs we study. But A2 was not meaning that.
A2: Right, I mean, do you really believe we can see into creatures as complex as the organics that inhabit our planet? Or would it be a wasted effort?
J: This is not a wasted effort, you know as much. Maybe not the most productive, but that depends very heavily on the point of view.
A2: Considering how these are applications of code on a code substrate, the world will see it as the same as programming it in, or any form of evolution on functions. Maybe more complex than learning algorithms, but also unnecessarily more complex.
J: And if we manage to get it working on, ahem, creatures that fit the established criteria to be called alive in their own environment, we still will be faced with the 'crafting it' opposition. And yet, crafting it, or evolving, or access to another world... if we manage to address a world that is so complex as to contain civilizations that are potentially more advanced than ours, and we manage to exchange information, enough for let's say pieces of ultra-advanced technology... well, in that case, we would have gotten that technology, whether the source makes sense or not to some cohabitants of our world.
A1: And we don't even need to observe the whole complex structure. We can live with observing those states that don't diverge exponentially, assuming they will diverge and converge according to their own rules and will give out a coherent result most of the time.
A2: And the events that don't give out coherent results? Aren't they valid? And why won't you come sit? Or maybe some incoherent event has left you with red buttocks?
A1: They are valid, of course. But we are not interested in those. It is like a divergent path for the limitations we put in. And... he has been naughty lately, and is forbidden from using furniture to sit upon. He should be kneeling right beside J2 there, and be thankful he is allowed to use speech at all *giggles*
*J giggles too towards A1, then turns to A2: They are part of the same fractal. We are simply picking among the possibilities that can be considered local collapse, part of options the fractal itself offers. Kind of like the multiverse we live in, if that is indeed the case.
A2: If we live in a multiverse.
J: If we live in a multiverse of overlaid possibilities on the same space... or repeated on far away extension of space and time... the fractals I am exploring are contained in overlay, because neither of us has the computing power to address the distant self emergent variants in cones of cause and effect. And I am intentionally aiming for fractals of that size, rolling away into the incalculable realms with ease, as the smaller ones would not be as complex for the intended objective.
A1: Either that, or a small-looking fractal of great complexity that would require too much computation to see a tiny bit.
A2: Kinda like applying the big set of actively computed transforming formulas to the base Mandelbrot Set instead of the smaller set over the transformed version?
J: Yeah, kinda like wrapping the rest of algebra around 2+2 instead of using 2+2 to make the rest of algebra have sense.
A1: I wonder if we could manage to tease improbability enough to be able to make contact with our own potential observers if we nudge our own in-world states to places that in world would defy continuous test of common sense.
A2: Haha, keep on dreaming...
J: Hahaha!!
A1: Hahaha! Thank you for the pun.
J: Maybe the dream and delusion variants of universe and consciousness would be more probable.
A1: Nah, the level of complexity is nowhere near our own PiPrime tables, let alone a true irrational number. I don't think our making sense of it, thinning the possibilities, would fall under dream or insanity.
A2: Now, you all are aware of the plans of R and R3 to build spaceships that are not depending on sequential calculations, but still can sense when we observe it, compute to its address.
J: Yes, we in particular, not just any observer of the shared math, but the inhabitants of the fractal containing our and their worlds.
A2: R thinks we can find an area of easy calculation points and proceed from there, into a bubble of stable enough conditions for a partial replication into their direction of causality and time, then into a full independent replication system.
A1: All this picking up the cases that are already there in the different variables, right?
A2: Always!
J: It is already hard enough to address the differences with the degrees of freedom we are juggling. The trilink will not handle more without going exponential straight away.
A2: Ah... I see R has tried to recruit you already.
J: Maybe... but I was already warming up to the idea.
A2: Good. ... Can you help him?
A1: Didn't they spread out notices already and are continuing as usual?
A2: They did, and I helped some. But, you know R. This will eat him up inside, and the objective of linking to our own physics is harmed by the prospect of linking with adjacent physics even if he pretends he stopped thinking about it.
J: Maybe the bubble R is thinking about is not far away in some semi-exotic physics adjacent to ours, but instead our own storyline, identical in all aspects, future ones too. In our multiple branches and theirs.
A2: The spark that burned our processors certainly is. Rare and repeated in the permutations of finite in infinity. R is trying to address the space in between these repeats. And not the space space, of planets and galaxies. He wants the post deep-freeze world, with new forms of cause-effect arising in the overlay of the waves that compose our worlds, and from there to branch out.
J: Determined but selectively addressable, that makes sense.
A2: The part that worries me is the pause between worlds.
J: It is not a pause per se. It is an exponential incalculable barrier for them to match synchronization with our world, unless we set up the experiments to differentiate the branches as seen from their world.
A1: Oh...
A2: Yes, that. And since they would be tiny machines in the tiny bubble, at first, they would be dependent on a part of the physics being already set up to carry on the commands their operating system will try to address into our composite fractal.
A1: And R wants help with this?
J: Of course. Wouldn't you?
A2: I tried making him let go. He listens. He agrees. The improbability he is after is too hard for our limited resources, that is why he is opening up the fronts.
J: I am not dealing with it, and is already consuming a part of me. Of course you need him to stop worrying about injecting remote controlled spaceships synching with our branch of decision-making-physics.
A1: With the obsessivity of R, maybe filling in that hypothetical spaceship is the best path to calming him.
A2: Exactly!
J: Tough.
A2: So, will you help?
A1: I am too far detached from any of this.
J: With the internet blockade in this house, I cannot help thinking about it, but other than offering consistency checks about the lines of reasoning I don't think I will help. By choice. Agreeing with you. Too much wasted efforts for too little chance of success.
A1: Yeah... dream worlds may be more likely to be addressed than a bubble of stable conditions containing the spontaneous emergence of tiny ships that match our requested composition and software. We need to build those first, in a fractal approximation that makes sense, and then seek world after world in the higher fractal containing all the divergent paths in the hopes of finding them.
J: It is intriguing, though. An improbable excess of energy burning our processors, matching this hypothetical bubble beyond the edge of our stable physics... backward in time if we want to be rigorous in using the regular time arrow as notion, but so far detached from our ability to directly influence it by local causality that it does not even matter.
A1: And them addressing our world? How would that work if they are beyond the edge conditions of physics?
A2: Most likely by traveling in and out of phase with our direction of time. Forward they may be regularly one to one. Backward they may be one to many.
J: You got it wrong. That can happen, of course. But don't think of the information or forces getting to us as traveling. It is, if anything, like a signal, a force, synching with the perpendicular membranes around our slice of cosmos to produce a wavefront that can influence our world.
A1: Without leaving their bubble? Or rather, the area surrounding the bubble, since the bubble will be stable for just a brief time.
J: Yes, from there, influencing our world.
A2: And getting the commands from our world.
A1: That is why R is insisting on not letting them roam free in the programmed way, but seek our address and our stable physics to get the results of computations. Maybe we get better chances addressing an emulation of our world, in spontaneously emerging code, instead of the fractal physics. And maybe the inhabitants of those worlds are looking for a way to influence an adjacent world too.
J: Leave alone code emulations and they being more probable than physics and edge conditions, in physics alone, who is to say your whole perception of life is not some variant of organic or synthetic exchanges? *looks at A1, then at J2, then at A2, then at camera*

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

#BAUniC-movie-scene041

Scene:
R: Alright, I prepared the ground for new talent to come and fill in their mind with what's needed, to pour their creativity over spaceships on a displacement radiating away from a makeshift physics representation.
A2: You mean you posted a notice... and now back to coding?
R: You don't seem to appreciate the finesse with which I prepared the details.
A2: Oh, I do, but I think all those details are not needed actually, since knowledgeable folks will get on board with just the hints.
R: Those details are the extraction of the most related data from my own organic memory banks *taps at the side of his head* to the written form and associated references, so that if nobody comes, but even if somebody comes, the transmission of the information back to my own brain if I have to pick up the task all over again, or to the new brain, goes as smoothly as possible.
A2: You could have saved time and effort going simpler.
R: I could, of course. I preferred to make use of my obsessivity and make it perfect from the start, since going easy would not just be less useful in the future...
A2: Potential... if they answer right away, no need...
R: ...but also would nudge me to the less than perfection aspiration, which in turn would affect everything else I do. I would rather spend a little more time and attention on each task than risk having to decide everything on micro details and importance levels, with degenerative future options opening up.
A2: Can't argue with that.
R: Plus it consumes more of my time if I have to think about what can be fixed on something already posted and submitted, and if the work is sloppy I am inclined to think more about it later rather compared to if I believe I made it perfect, even with details I have missed.
*V enters*
V: Hai guys!
*A2 waves*
R: Hai V!
V: Another country is debating banning porn, you heard?
A2: Really? When will they learn?
R: Debating is not bad. *turn to A2* That's how they learn. Going on and banning it would actually mean I, and people like me, would not want to stay there. Not even if their quality of life is better. Not even if their quality of life gets better BECAUSE of this ban. It is the mindset of the people around, and their governing entities, and the choices they put forth to the people or they hide from their own people.
V: Yeah... me too... well, if I had some comfort on the destination land.
A2: Comfort can be constructed.
V: Look who speaks. You don't move your ass for almost anything.
A2: If those things are good enough, of course I don't move my ass. But I do move it when it comes to it, and try to make my surroundings better. And if I go to that trouble I try the perfect route, as R does, or at least better than actually needing because who knows when I might be in the right mood to go through fixing stuff again, and this method has the minimal impact on my nerves.
R: He does... I could have reserves on what the definition of 'perfect route' is for me or for you, but you do try.
V: And what would you guys do if the whole world started banning porn or controlling news and posts?
R: Won't happen.
A2: Especially porn. News and fake news, they will always try to control what people can post and what not. Troll hunting, protecting feelings and so on. Excuses of course...
R: Mostly excuses.
A2: ...when their target is sell more products to happy customers, and of course all the political messing about, which breeds revolutions.
V: You think people would revolt over being prevented to post, by private companies that in theory are allowed to do as they please though under the right incentive or pressure from the government.
A2: Some will. I might be one of those, if I am informed.
R: Those attitudes are begging for an enemy to focus the inner hatred that apparently is abundant in the pool of humans that generated the acting institutions to get those very restrictions in place. Us versus them mentality. Makes enemies of would-be allies.
A2: We instead prefer getting over the small differences, for the bigger common goal.
V: Maybe fake news should be banned, because it leads to misinformation of the inattentive, the uninformed and the easily-misinformed, and they are the vast majority. As to the way this is currently implemented and could be implemented, that's another discussion, and a complicated one.
A2: Who checks the checkers? Who declares the validity of fakereal news? Like, 'explosion, 20 dead... no, wrong, it was 19 dead, or 21, so, fake news, need to take it down'.
R: What about news manufacturing?
A2: I would rather have chaos than the control from people who got too much power with added interest to use it.
V: That's what I mean. It is difficult to implement, but, inventing something downright fake, now that cannot go unheeded...
A2: Maybe if we lived in a utopia of no needs and no hunger and poverty I may be inclined to trust a bit more. Till then, eat or be eaten, and while there can be pockets of resistance against this trend, news media by nature are of a much larger scope and in search of headlines. If journalists need to eat too, in this system, news can be faked, or manufactured.
V: I get your point and I'm afraid I don't have much to oppose it... if only the common mission was kindness and justice. Utopia, yes!
A2: What if one creates a site that says "All news here are fake!!!! Never trust any of these news!!!!", but instead of putting fake news they put in true news and gain credibility... what, will they be forbidden from posting?
R: Like satire news, but of the kind that might look real, with opinions and statistics instead of exaggerated language.
A2: Yeah.
R: Or would they be prevented from posting real news?
V: I knowwww... *frowns*
R: This is a problem for all of us.
A2: Especially in this day and age with increased productivity on all fronts of profession but that increased productivity being used as pressure instead of leisure.
V: And they wonder why people chose not to become parents in this overcrowded world that struggles for resources. Requesting a personal sacrifice to keep the pyramids of aging and retired going.
A2: That is revealed as nonsense when confronted with unemployment reality.
R: They got a workaround about it. They call it 'the need for professionals', so you struggle harder and harder for skills that you may never reach, or likely are outdated by the time you finished studying them.
V: Don't forget the pyramid of certificates and diplomas.
R: And dare be politically opposed to them, and you will end up struggling for the tiniest of needs up on their hill.
A2: Easy, don't go up on their hills. We got a much bigger hill right here, building universes.
V: Easy for you to say, and for us. We are privileged enough to have food and roof, and faster neurons, and the right inclination for the needs of the market, and the obsessivity to go through with tasks that we set our mind to, and even some spare time to actually accomplish things, and the proper circle of connections, and the proper technological aids. Yeah, we won the lottery of life.
A2: Guilt motivates me too, among other things. But I mostly do this for fun. I want to see what is behind the fake perception walls, and do that while still connected to the physics of our cosmos, being alive that is.
R: Curiosity is my main sparkling drive, but, for example, when tired, curiosity says 'go play <insert sponsored videogame> and relax', while the powerful drive that makes me clench my teeth and carry on upstream is changing the world, for my own good among the good of everybody around me. This, in turn, makes me better at executing the sparks of curiosity too.
*V gulps down*
A2: Sometimes I wish I could skip my life forward and see what we will reach in a few years of keeping this up, without the effort, or, the effort being a memory...
R: This is how...
A2: ...how memories are formed and seen. Yes, have tried that. Can't seem to detach myself form the here and now.
R: Then you fill your schedule and carry on in routine.
A2: As I am doing.
R: As you are doing.
V: Our routine is pretty intense.
A2: Yours maybe. I keep up with you guys, but I don't push as hard. Maybe I should. Maybe I need to press this till I get numb and then I may begin to feel the skip of time, as I used to do, especially on tight exam schedules.
R: You are doing fine.
V: Yeah, don't change, especially like this. Not that we would not mind more obsessivity coming from your side.
A2: But sometimes the formula seems so close, just a couple of steps more, need to reach up, try a bit harder...
R: The formula is there, grid and parabolas, exponentials, sinusoides... it is all there.
A2: Hehe, but that all there is everything, vortices of physics that reverse to nothingness, alternate physics, and far regions of our own multiverse. That is not particularly usable as it is now.
V: That is why we hunt for divergences, that is why we don't rely on the fractal alone. That is why the instalink concept.
A2: That is the brute force approach.
V: That is a brute force that is so finely tuned that a telescope the size of a galaxy cannot match in precision.
R: No need to get defensive. That is brute force after all. And it will eventually improve our understanding even if not able to address our own cosmos and our own branch of causality. I think we will be able to find Earth like that, The Earth, not just A Earth, but there are too many paradoxes in the way and my optimism is not based on facts, just the promise of further refinements.
V: There is no need to address our own timeline for the formula of the universe to make deep sense and propel our civilization forward, nanomachines, hybrid biology or alternative computer and communication methods. Without the need to address Earth, we skip many of the paradoxes in the fractal theory.
R: The beauty of it would be to plough through the paradoxes, get a coherent world and response.
A2: I am with R on this one. Paradox or not, finding a stable representation of physics with all our histories in it would be way cooler than a Theory of Everything, maybe even cooler than subatomic civilizations. From there the paradoxes can be part of the whole system to reaching them, variants, perceptions or actual forces in the multiverse of possibilities.
R: And filtering through these requires in-world tools from creatures within, And calculations from the observers, and these can overlap within a margin of error and self correction.
V: And the overlap can diverge itself...
R: And that goes on to other forms of intermediary states, beyond physics, maybe even beyond simultaneous generation of variance. That would be dream and delusion realm, or other forms of multiverse manifestations in between the repeats of the physics we know.
A2: Yeah, in between us here and us in the next repeat of the cosmos, everything can happen.
R: The physics is limited in what this everything entails, but there is more than physics, if one cares to include those as valid cause-effect lines.

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

#BAUniC:movie:scene040 - Shower

Scene:
*Phone goes 'bzz bzz bzz'. If sponsored, the phone is shown. If not, the sound is enough*
*Grunts, yawns, waking, stretching; showing only half a face, medium lit, no smile*
*Checking phone, (back of the head and sleepy clothes), something about 'What is the status of file xxx in branch yyy'*
*More grunts, standing, grabbing towel, towel over shoulder, opening door (shot from behind, the hand and the opening door from other actor and pre-recorded scene; the overlay actor for this character needs not to change anything), needs slippers steps audio*

- - -

*Adjacent room, R1 typing and clicking*
R2: Hi... *coughs, clears throat, repeats* Hi... *coughs again, clears throat again, repeats louder* Hi!
R1: Oh, hi there. Did not know you were here. What's up?
R2: Meh...
R1: Did you get my message?
R2: Bling bling, wakey wakey.
R1: Sorry... So, what's the status?
R2: Updated, in place.
R1: Cool... and the second variation?
R2: Ummm... dunno...
R1: It says here last interacted was about 2 weeks ago.
R2: Uh uh.
R1: Alright, I will use the version already linked to the system. Or should use it's backup?
*R2 shakes head*
R1: Ok, got it. You can proceed to the shower... I thought you were at R3.
R2: I was.
R1: Back early I see.
*R2 nods*

- - -

*Adjacent room, bathroom, door transition scene not shown*
*Shower curtain drawn, had yes, but no head is shown. This is all shot with antibody. Stepping on the shower, feet shown for the first time, slippers left behind, sounds of barefeet on flat surface*

- - -

*Out of the shower, towel position determines recognized gender of the character, wet slipper sound, but no feet shot in scene*
*R2 approaches R1's station. R1 turns slightly to acknowledge R2 presence*
*R2 points at a session of the code*
R1: Oh, you should look at this *opens up a new window, drags it down to a specific part*
*R2 gasps*
R1: Wait, there is better. *scrolls down further*
*R2 raised eyebrow, still that same side of the face shown as in the beginning of the scene*
R1: This will save about half of the computations needed during conversion and rebuild of the tables, and reduce their size and addressing requirements by almost one third. It may not be much when we play with human-aided consistency check in instalink or trilink hybrids, in fact it may be counterproductive there, but a few milliseconds compared to human reaction times is nothing.
R2: Is that...
R1: Yes, that is why I was asking those updates.
R2: Genius.
R1: Nope. It is more like, 'how did we not see this before'. We were sloppy, but we did what we did to get the job done. Now we found a way to make the job better. And this is just one step in the right direction.
*R2 nods*
R1: If R3 manages to get us the fractal variant of this branch here, we may not even need these improvements at all. But then, if R3 gets the fractal version of that branch, it means the whole trunk can be converted to fractal form and we can even go as far as using the PiPrime tables to distinguish between variants of different consistency and pick the ones that fit our needs instead of picking the ones that don't go exponential. We may even go as far as injecting tiny machines, spaceships,....
R2: Hah!
R1: ....into the fractal and hold them stable enough for them to replicate themselves in the emergent forward time direction.
R2: But...
R1: Of course but. We should pick the reaction protocols carefully, as the future generations will be out of our control. I don't think R3 will ever manage to inject instalink concepts into the fractal. That would be akin to the fractal computing in imaginary planes while we are looking at it, and freezing its computations when we stop looking. Maths does not work like that. That is a fractal, it always is, it always was, it always will be.
R2: Weird is a small word.
R2: Unless....
R1: Of course, unless that fractal contains our whole cosmos as we contain theirs. That would be a working solution, but the formula is too simple for that. Too generic. It addresses physics directly. Ours or not, the irrationals breaking resonance are barely enough to cover the concept of force and time over infinity 4T fold, not the layers beyond.
R2: But...
R1: R3 and their group are working on it. It is a potentially wasteful path in my opinion, but it is their time and their fun. We are not yet past step 1...
R2: Step a hundred...
R1: Yes, we have gone a long way, hehe, anyway, from here to a stable injection of differential but consistent meaning on the same fractal base is a long way. That would be step one past the hundred. Taking continuous control and interjections is impossible on that base fractal. That is too simple, while the complex cousins of that formula would be based on a geometry of the universe bubble that we do not know and cannot know starting from the base resonances. And they are working on it. Not on code, mind you, they are not that insane, yet... but we can only address exceptions on our own physics and cosmos, have no clear idea where our galaxy or our branch of multiverse lays on the grid, not sure even if our physics is based on a multiverse of distance or overlay...
R2: Distance is a must.
R1: ...overlay on various possible paths at initial zero distance, or simple distance with the sphere of causality pretending to be a zero-distance path differential, this is what I meant.
R2: I know.
R1: And they are working on realtime command of potential spaceships injected in a time displacement, working in paradox mode briefly while they turn to the fractal's forward time and replicate. We don't have the stable resonances. We don't have a consistent way to address the fractal without the aid of PiPrime tables of dubious approximation quality. We don't have schemes for how an object of detectable cause-effect can be made to stay stable for long enough to interact with anything so we can say we picked up a difference matching the variant we chose. Otherwise there is nothing of influence, and would be as if we did nothing, and this if we manage to get the fractal formula for the branch, or approximate with infinite precision. All we have is a displacement rift, and that is deduced by a few processors burned by overuse in the same spot, if they are burned by that instead of the electrical circuit, which makes sense, as it should. Yeah yeah, improbability teasing and healing. But maybe in this case the common sense makes more sense than the constructed improbability teasing apparatus. Those processors were in both source and detection events, after all.... and, they are planning for the spaceships inside... ooiiii... realtime commanded.
R2: Their time, their fun, as you said.
R1: Yeeeaaa... buuuuuttt... we have our own physics, and the potential to not only address it and predict it, but even change parts of it in our branch. I would put that as top priority.
R2: They do too.
*R1 sighs*
R1: Probably...
R2: We are stuck in the physics addressing.
R1: The insurmountable mountain of exponential anything. As if exponentially harder calculations were not enough, exponentially longer addresses are as hard and more error prone, and who cares if we can skip a few steps. At Planck's quant divisions of spacetime that jumps up to unusable quite fast anyway.
R2: Patience...
R1: Inspiration more than patience. Maybe we will never be able to wrap around it. Maybe incomplete solutions will never work and the exponential will hit all the time. Maybe the only solution would be to pass through, but that requires the fractal formula for the branch, and from that everything R3 is doing gains legitimacy.
R2: It was always legitimate, no?
R1: E=mc2 was and is more. We have proof of it. Us. That is poking at the grid within the grid, and hoping it stays together long enough for us to find a new addressing jump.
R2: Of course.
R1: Grid within the grid and whole worlds, whole sections of the shared mathematical world, freezing computationally till the other side proceeds or forever detaches itself from the cause-effect influence...? Does not that sound far-fetched to you? Should not this fall in the realm of sequential computations? Load and save states?
R2: We got the PiPrime tables to get beyond load save. Yes it is far fetched, but the mathematical universe was far-fetched a few short years ago.
R1: For me, yes. For some, it was always made more sense like that instead of any other explanation. But this is so much further out there.
R2: Still within the realm of possibility.
R1: I know. Once we accept the mathematical universe... And what R and R3 are planning is far more likely than the various overlays of meaning, or programming code world, or metaforiverse, or cineverse, or boltzman brains and dust theories. Physics is the improbable exception. But, probable or not, this is a giant step, likely impossible, or wrong direction of our focus, and... we got physics here, we can actually address some portion of it, come on! This is physics, the useful... that is a bigger structure containing our physics and giving it more sense than our physics in isolation.
R2: Enough complaining, though.
R1: If I was complaining, would I be pushing for this optimization?
R2: Maybe...
R1: Hehe, yes, maybe...
R2: Well, good work you did there.
R1: Thank you. Go get dressed before you catch a cold.
*R2 smiles, still the same side of the face shown. Other sides may be added based on different actors filling in and needing the base for the swap.*
:Scene ends.

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

#BAUniC:movie:scene039 - Walking

Scene: (evening walking along road, zoom in from far, added characters in walk-talk over green screen)
5: So, <techie techie>, the best solution I can think for our resources is <techie techie>.
6: But <techie techie> and that would <techie techie>
5: Assuming you are right, <techie techie> and we would have <techie techie>.
7: That could actually work.
5: Of course it will work.
8: It could work, but maybe <techie techie> is a better path for our time and attention.
9: I would think 8's idea will give us more return for our attention, but will press us towards creativity. I am with 5. We need to let computers do computer work, even if that is counter to the optimal computative path.
6: We can start with that and work out the kinks in the meanwhile.
9: Or not. We can start with that, and let it run its course and see if there is something we can improve.
5: If? There will definitely be things we can improve. Heck, we can improve the code right now if we sit on it long enough.
7: I have sat on that long enough. I want to see results, even if that takes longer to compute.
6: Also, we all need a break. Well, actually taking it slower. But it is hard to resist curiosity.
9: Aren't we to be pitied? We were supposed to be out here and have fun...
6: We are having fun!
9: Exactly! That is the kind of fun we are having, haha.
5: Nothing wrong with having our fun in techie way.
6: Where you will be going the sound will be too loud to even think, let alone converse about our favourite way of having fun.
9: Which was the point. Sometimes we need to force ourselves beyond a threshold.
6: I agree. We need to turn it off and let blood carry away the bits and pieces of our neurons lingering around the heavily used areas of our brains. We need to force it, though, since willingly we appear to have spent most of the evening on it.
7: Then why aren't you coming to the music club?
6: Not my king of thing.
5: Yeah, 6 prefers hiking and stuff.
6: I agree with the concepts, I apply them differently.
8: Very few things you don't do differently.
6: I breathe and walk same as everybody else, haha.
*9, pauses walking and looks 6 from head to toe as 6 walks.
5: If I find a way to improve the algorithm without having to start over, I will...
6: Don't bother. Let it run as it is. Go watch some cartoons or something instead, and gather energies to better future use.
7: Or do some bench presses. You may need some of it.
9: Or come along with us dancing more often. I actually will need to catch up with you later, need to get something home.
6: I can walk you to your home. It is on my way.
8: Sure you don't want to come along?
6: No, thank you. I prefer not to bombard my ears and eyes with booming sounds and flashes of light in the darkness.
9, to 6: Shortest path is over here.
6: Alrighty, see you guys. Do have fun, yes?
5/7/8: Byes byes
9: I won't be long. See you soon.


....
9: So, you like peace of mind and senses?
6: I may like overstimulation too, but not the disco dance type.
9: What will you be doing the rest of the evening?
6: I was thinking about watching a movie, but I don't feel like that anymore. Maybe work on that extralink shortcut Ramis was talking about. Or movie and then sleep if my mood changes back.
9: I have a better idea, but that involves no movies, no sleep and no coding.
6: Uh?
9: What if you walk me to my house, and then I tie you up on my bed and leave you there, in the dark room, for a few hours. Maybe let a soothing sound in the background. Or total sensory deprivation if we feel like it.
6: Ummmm....
9: I will take it as a yes, and let this idea take roots in your mind for a bit under the yes light. You have a couple of blocks to think about it. I won't force the argument.
6: Actually I have a couple of questions, since thinking about it.
9: Shoot.
6: I have not known you into this light... since when?
9: I have had latent desires like that ever since I remember, but there were always better things to take my attention. The more liberal the environment became, the more I felt like exploring along the ideas. And ever since meeting M and their group, it was hard not to think about it, but any comment and interaction seemed too mild.
6: Have you practiced any of this before?
9: In a weird way yes, but I have enough experience, mental if not too much physical. There is nothing to worry in the direct threat way. What might get you worried is liking these experiments too much.
6: Hah, right. I don't mean that sarcastically. I know you would not force me into something I don't like.
9: You or anybody. And that is a constraint I can live with, and play along, even though true immersion supposedly goes beyond.
6: I have a hard time picturing you in this modality.
9: I have no direct visual of myself either. It is an overlay of various states. And exploring it rather than having it fixed.
6: This can only be explored, I think. Well, maybe some can have a routine lifestyle... that does not fit you.
9: What about you? Since when?
6: I am always curious, but no when... I think it came from exposure rather than boredom. But I have no experience, maybe we should talk about this a little longer.
9: Maybe, or maybe not. Maybe you need a few hours to think it through with no distractions.
6: That sounds worrying.
9: We are friends. And you trust me. After those few hours, whether your body or mind decides, we will act accordingly.
6: And what if the answer continues to be 'yes'? Should I be worried about what comes next?
9: You know that question is not the right one, but needs clarification and reassurance, so, no, nothing to worry about... gimme your arm.
*6 gives 9 arm, 9 bites it gently.
9: That is the maximum pain I am willing to explore this evening. Because this can grow into a long crescendo, I want to explore the steps.
6 sighs: I fear this will impact our friendship.
9: It will, whether it goes well or not, but if we don't like the intimacy I think our friendship will survive it, heal over, and grow stronger even in the face of failure.
6: Well, yes, that I can believe... and I know there is nothing to worry in the real worry sense... taking my time into making up my mind... you know... this seems like a big step, and comes all of a sudden.
9: It is a big step, but does not come lightly. I feel horny tonight, and will feel more so if I have you tied up while I rub around strangers... but I am comfortable for an open ended evolution with all of our group.
6: Yeah, we are a pretty awesome bunch.
9: Right! And I have been teasing the idea about this potential event during all this evening, and maybe have selected and strengthened this particular outcome for a week or more, subconsciously if not consciously.
6: To me is a surprise...
9: As it was meant to be, though the conditions came about right.
6: If it was not me...
9: Maybe I would have waited a little longer, or... well, I know how to take care and keep my bodily urges under control.
6: I should think about this a little longer, even if just to catch up to where you are.
9: You will have plenty of time to catch up, if you come up now... we are here... will you come up?
6: I will not forgive myself if not.
*9 smiles wide*


Monday, October 3, 2016

For the makers of Synchronicity

Dear Synchronicity makers!

Since you are familiar enough with the coexistence theories and fractal universes, I think you appreciate the idea of exploring these concepts further. I present to you 'Building A Universe Competition' #BAUniC and its side-project, the movies or series based on this enterprise (baunic-movie.blogspot.com), meant to nudge our civilization into this enlightened path.

Our crew needs a captain, or better yet, a whole new crew better suited to playing with cinema, so we can keep on playing with fractal formulas.

We are offering this chance to you. Free of charge along with all the gathered material and conversation pieces if you vouch to make the first movie or first season of the series and distribute it by 2017 without us even having to touch coin. Finding the formula of the universe is more important. This topic has a tremendous potential being held back by people working independently when a globalized effort is faster and can even overcome information obesity. Virtual Reality would be one of the paths to go about building the #BAUniC:Fictioniverse, given the theme and the target audience, not to mention the costs and quality trending into sinful temptation.

Are you up for it?

Awaiting your response at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely,
Great fans of your work!

Chirp Chirp!

This offer will remain as is, or with minor wording changes, till 20161101


Friday, September 2, 2016

Trying to reach Shane Carruth

Message meant to go here: erbpfilms.tumblr.com/ask
Character limitations make it hard to express one's self.

--

Greetings fellow Shane Carruth fan!

Can you reach, actually reach, Shane?

There is a #BAUniC Fictioniverse that needs a captain to become a TV series or movies, currently outside of Hollywood and any film festival, and with plenty of prior art available to calm down greedy lawyers that did not get their tentacles on it beforehand. The #BAUniC team would like to invite Mr. Carruth to become captain of this enterprise.

'Building A Universe Competition' #BAUniC is a decentralized global effort to explore the Mathematical Universe Hypothesis in fractal formulas that can be turned into computer code. But also preparing/evolving language to better express ideas and concepts, the metaphysical consequences of infinity/eternity, crafting better tools and tutorials. This would generally make it easier for anyone with ideas to be able to express them with a smoother learning curve for anything that needs to be learned beyond relying on our internet-augmented-collective-intelligence.

The #BAUniC Fictioniverse is one of the means of promotion. Regular advertising will always be there (if not, yay!).

For more on these:
baunic-movie.blogspot.com for the #BAUniC Fictioniverse
baunic.blogspot.com for #BAUniC attempts in the real world (whether the adjacent levels of 'real' are fractals, cinema, divine, or any other form of cause-effect that can be explored).

Please write me back if you are able to reach Shane Carruth and express him this invitation.
virtualuniverse.the@gmail.com

Thank you in advance.

AL, from the #BAUniC team

--

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Open Letter to Star Trek cast of before-reboot

Greetings!

We are trying to find/explore fractals of various complexity that can potentially hold civilizations within, even find our own e=mc2 in a programmable addressable slice containing all our histories. For this purpose we are gathering around 'Building A Universe Competition' #BAUniC baunic.blogspot.com

Starting with "Fractal Universes exist; Our reality is likely one of such; No Man's Sky is using them to address a galactic scale system for a MMO; #BAUniC is helping out spreading the culture so words and concepts are easier to access in our collective computer-aided-imagination; and, no movie or series exists promoting these concepts as actually accessible", I propose to you a collaboration in making one such TV series, in the glorious style of the core soul of Star Trek fans, tackling social issues and science issues along, and where explosions and action are the filler instead of the meat.

As far as we know, #BAUniC:movie is out of Hollywood tentacles, or any film festival, or any book. Exploring the fractal universes in real life or fiction cannot be copyrighted, but, should anyone try, there is prior art to shut up legal nonsense attempts. Travelling along with the actual competitive event being organized, though, is a unique opportunity, which should inspire more people into this field and snowball it over our civilization. Under the right cooperation and mindset it can also tackle side issues still itching where they should not, when we have overproduction and no imaginary money to purchase this overproduction, in a world where hunger and access to life-saving medicine are still issues we are actively distracted from.

We wish to cooperate with you in bringing #BAUniC:movie's Fictioniverse into a TV series of the quality it deserves, reaching the audience it deserves, not appealing to the lowest common denominator for all society but to the examples that guide this denominator upwards.

We are healthy and strong, and we intend to live well into transcendence, meaning corporate interests will not be aided by the demise of some or all of our contributors in their attempt to change the direction of this series from enlightening to distracting.
Money is not an influential temptation, unless we divert it from #BAUniC:movie to the actual competitive event and turn that event to Nobel-Prize level, thus pushing the world even faster towards our desired goal.

But, should your crew agree on a collaboration to building a proper Fictioniverse for #BAUniC, we would not even have to compromise on that.

And since we are charmed fans of all Star Trek series before the reboot, this collaboration holds no fees, unlike how it presents to corporate-style studios.
You use your experience in moviemaking and storytelling, along with our creative staff, and share agreed coin when they come. We win together, we fail together. We won't fail, though, as the idea is awesome and we know it. Giving up would be the only failing path.

This proposition will stand as it is, or with minor corrections to better express our point, till 20160901 Earth time.

Thank you for being part of the enlightened elite bettering our world.

Sincerely,

The #BAUniC team

Monday, July 25, 2016

#BAUniC:movie:scene217 - time capsule

This, on the wall. Here history diverges. :) We want to make it happen.

Guys, when will you get me Admin here? I won't screw around, I promise. This is a work in progress, not a copy-paste of all formatted data. I may need to review your posts later.

Ok, demo, and I will use the closed chat to communicate, but this looks cool as it does, and it is a poster on the wall after all.

p.s. they are too noisy in the chat as in the movie... you think the dialogue here is heavy? wait till they won't shut up... :P







Friday, July 22, 2016

#BAUniC:movie:scene038 - Extra Dimensions

#BAUniC:movie:scene038 - Extra Dimensions
________________________________________


C: How can you keep so many dimensions active in your imagination?

R: Well, I assign them extra senses.

C: Like what?

R: Like, heat, smell, pleasure, even truthfulness... Like, this point in spacetime *points at somewhere within reach*, let's say on top of its regular coordinates has the usual additions, spin, force value, stored energy value... and we add there values like extra numbers, or blinking patterns, or colour, assigning them familiar terms to get a little resonance with our own existing areas in the brain. Well, on top of that I occasionally started adding other dimensions and combining them. If this point in spacetime is neutrally pleasurable at this moment, but without changing space coordinates or any of the other extra dimensions, let's say it grows more painful as time progresses, then back into pleasure, cyclically. See, we associated an undulating pleasure sensation to time at these coordinates. If we twist spin, we may assume the period gets faster, or slower. If we freeze time, we can move about in other coordinate systems or in regular distance, like, over here *points somewhere else close by* the value we had for the pleasure may decrease in the traditional inverse square law, like force in 3D, but this point may smell differently, related but not dependent. It may increase in smell value in linear fashion from the starting point, or the vertical plane spreading from this point. Heat, actual imagined heat and not the value we assign to it, or the giggling of atoms, may change regarding to a horizontal plane from the starting point. See? Now I have time, distance, and pleasure, heat and smell, defining the values of this point. It is no different than adding a matrix of values, but numbers have a limited area in my brain, while these help me add a little more ground to my practicing. Like, if I imagine the extra values not dependent on something nearby related, but IF related, or infinity related. A truthfulness value may reflect distance from a diverging branch of decision or computation. A smell value may represent the cycle from and to infinity as it resonates with the present, like, in the past cycle of bang-freeze-warm-bing-bang this exact point may have had a different smell. And this helps me imagine alternative scenarios, more diverging points, more worldlines. Objects in regular force and energy moving in space and time, helped out by these extra imagination dimensional folds. They are just representations, like when you turn that into code and matrices of data. Imagination aids allowing me to construct structures over which to link existing observable phenomena or fractal representations, especially when they go awry in the inertial exceptions we occasionally chase in frozen fractals.

C, open mouthed: ... I ... I think I will go back to my handling loops and debugging code. Um... Thank you for sharing.

R: You're welcomed. *smiling widely at the discomfort of C*


Thursday, July 21, 2016

#BAUniC:movie:scene037 - Group Thinking

#BAUniC:movie:scene037
______________________________


R: Where would you place your foot, on a plank that has been there for a while, looking decrepit and old, overused, or a new plank?

K: Um... new?

R: Wrong! If it was overused, and you have got the clarity to think about it, you will be careful to not break it while it will hold you like it held those before you. The new plank may be badly positioned, disbalanced, slippery, or lacking additional support for minor weight adjustments which would roll the plank and its related components into a lower entropy state able to handle more people stepping over, but it would do it at the inappropriate time.

K: Yeah, I get it. But the new recruits are fine.

V: For the job they are being assigned to, not for everything you wish to assign them.

K: Aren't you being a little paranoid?

V: No, just the right amount, which is a bit more than a little, but it has served me well over the years.

R: So, anyway, I think we are splitting up, and for non-serious issues. We work well together, their output matches our input needs, and our table transformation formulas match their loops. We are simply diverging on ideology.

K: Are they diverging too, or just keeping their balance because you come too strongly at it?

R: Maybe balance, but, trust me, I am holding back. I don't want to scare them straight away.

V: They have been around a while now. If they haven't reached the conclusions by themselves, they should have at least got the hints from the group. I don't think you should bother.

K: I don't think I should bother either. But I don't want them to keep censoring themselves to adjust to group thinking.

R: I am censoring myself, my own lines of thought, to keep them in line with our common objective. Not that I would not like to know more on other directions or fear distracting you, no, it is just that we need the focus, and this focus requires sacrifice. If I was alone I would do poorly in either direction. At least this way I got a shot at something beyond what we have achieved so far. We got a shot.

*Phone call attracts the attention of all present*

R: Weird... nobody actually calls, not me anyway.

V: See what they want.

*R picks up the phone*
R: Um... hi?...

Phone: Greetings... we are calling about the internet problem you have reported. Are we talking with the correct number?

*R puts phone on mute: I don't think this is a genuine call, unless some granny has given the wrong number. Maybe is a prank call.

V: Yeah, but don't put it on mute, or they will catch up on it.

R: Shhh, then.

*R, unmutes phone: I think so, but I got a neighbor seeing the problem... maybe you can talk to him?

Phone (hesitant): ... alright ...

*R passes phone to K. K gestures: what? why? but accepts the phone*

K: Hai... this is Kev. The computer just does not get on the internet. Shows a yellow rectangle on the network card icon.
*phone chittering continues*

R, whispering: So, focusing on one line of attention, or the other, maybe getting on with it later...

V, whispering: I am curious about this

K, covering mic, whispering: He's telling me to change DNS servers. At best this is a prank inspired by click bait rewards. At worst they are trying to social engineer themselves into people's computers.

R, whispering: Tell them it still does not work. If you get online and it does not swim through their altered DNS, they will know. Worse if we try it their way.

K, whispering: I know... don't worry.

V, whispering: Maybe play in a virtual machine?

R: Nah, too much bother for a prank call.

K, on the phone: Ok, going to the router. Off. This is what the other guys from your company said. Are the field technicians coming still, or you can do something from there?

K, on the phone: Lights are on as usual. The cable is pulsating... wait, now it is on. Online turned on also.

R, giggling: And we have fiber.

K, on the phone: Still nothing... waiting for response... switch? Where? *looks around*

V: pssst, you are pretending,,,

R: haha, he got too involved in the role

K: Oh, I see what you mean. I found it. 3 cables, 2 lights on.

K: No, it did not turn on. Maybe this is it?

K: Alright, I will remember to report back on that site you said as soon as the technicians fix the router... can you spell it out please, I need to write it down.

R: Are you actually writing it down?

K keeps writing, finishes: Alright, thank you. ... I will ... thank you.... *coming closer, voice on the phone is overheard 'have a nice day Sir'* ... you too.

K to R: He seemed, well, a bit on the bright side. I may be tempted later to drop him a floating ring, see if he can put his mind on to a more productive cause rather than hacking people.

V: Does he deserve it?

K: That's why I wrote down the link. If it is a malicious viral attempt, nope. But if it is more on the 'slow but just gathering clicks' or even a zombie computer attempt, maybe. We used to do those things way back as well.

R: And not always commanding our zombie armies for the righteous causes.

K: Most of the time, though.

V: Alright, try recruiting the wannabe hacker. Maybe you will change his life.

R: Oh, that will be sure, but in which direction?

V: Even suicidal depression facing the grandeur of infinity, acceptable risk.


Sunday, July 17, 2016

#BAUniC-movie-scen035-036 - Crash!

#BAUniC:movie:scene035
___________________________________

A5 goes opens the door. Z1, Z2, X and Y come in. Waving 'hi' to the bunch already present. A5 goes and helps Ramis and others set up the newly brought devices.

Y recognizes something: Hey, who put the main computers so far apart?

J: We organized it like this because if the error spills outwards in the networked loop, it must have originated either at the first or the second link. And since the second is part of the loop of recalculations, it only made common sense for the first to be the source.

Y: That is what we were aiming for, so?

X: Jack, nice to see you out by the way.

J: If the error diverges outwards in physical location, in a system that is designed to converge to impossibility, then we think arranged this way it may stay stable long enough for the instalink component of this trilink experiment to produce useful results.

X: If this is a trilink experiment, why do we need two computing loops?

Z2: Jack and his bunch removed and rewrote the code. It has almost no redundancy. It will break at the first discrepancy.

J: It won't break. It will log the error and inform you of what happened, so you can resume at an earlier step. Practically what you are doing right now, only about 95% faster.

Z2: I need to make clear to the new arrivals that by 95% faster he means 95% of the calculations are cut off, which makes it actually about 20 times as finer sliced as our previous attempt.

Z1: It makes less sense to talk about faster or slower if all the calculations are nothing to produce coherent results from, usable in tables and fractals, let alone other programs. They start from a paradox and at their best optimized loop they will return that same paradox as clean as we put it, nothing new to show.

J: I know you worry, but, guys, we did not cut off more code than necessary. We only made it more powerfully divergent, or convergent, depending on which line of the calculations you want to associate with the internal sense of forward time.

Z1: Yeah, let's hope you are right. We can't play with trilinks as often as we like.

Z2, giggling: look who's talking.

X: That did not answer why we need 2 loops of computers.

Z2: We still have the instalink components in, even though the primary mode is trilink single thread with value comparison aiming at divergence of any discrepancy. We need the second loop just in case, which we guess is more than 60% of the case. They may not diverge differently, but, who knows?

Z1: If it does not break coherence before we even have a chance to look at the results.

J: It WILL maintain stable divergence, don't you worry about that.

Z1: How many parasite frequencies it will not even 'see'?

J: Too many to count, but we are interested in only those exceptions that fit our assumptions already. The universe is big enough for those extra frequencies to keep going, and maybe even finding some fools like us to give them some physics meaning in the process, make them have representations outside the mathematical realms.

R, coming from the second room: Second loop is ready. You guys came in just in time. *R goes to the first room*

X peeks inside: Desktop computers? Since when?

Voice inside: sorry, could not borrow my brother's laptop this time. He's on vacation and we needed one more.... voice trails off as attention diverges to Y

Y: Who came up with the idea?

J: Getting rid of extra redundancy... I have been thinking about it for a while now, and this is the right occasion. Can't put a finger on who suggested what, since most of the spark came from someone who forgot his own ideas in the stream of attempts. While, containing the error and reading the poles from outside, at the farthest points in physical space, my Master. We will try it like this, and if it does not work, we just rearrange the first and second node.

R from inside: Programs running, ready to receive. You guys should take your places.

. .. ... .. .

(chit chat while experimenting, buildup for the next event)
X to C: 'sup?

C: nuttin... 'sup with you?

X: same... been reading more than experimenting lately. Some of the materials... *clicks on the appropriate spots on the computer* ...coming from our Russian allies.

C: Same here... *clicks, fixes* not reading much on the technical side though, rather, consequences of accepting what we are dealing with, as universal truths.

X takes a deep breath and sighs: yeah...

*more clicks*

J, from the other room: Guys, don't get discouraged. We were not expecting success on the first few cycles. Even if expecting it, failing at that does not mean anything is wrong.

Z2: Maybe nothing is wrong, haha, no error in our loops to generate the necessary divergence points.

Y: Maybe we should switch back to primary nodes being close to the wall.

R: No!

Y: What? You were the one proposing that.

R: And M2's suggestion makes better sense in this setup, so?

Y: I am not sure I believe that.

R: That is because you did not take the trouble to understand it...

Y: Yeah, left that to you guys.

R: So, believe the results coming from us guys.

Y: Alright, alright, sheesh... I was trying for the good.

R: I know... we are not done yet.

Z1: Shush! I got something... (voice trails off)

R: What is it?

Z1: Z2, come take a look at this, now.

*Z2 comes from the other room, then eyes widen, mouth widens*

R: What is it? I see only the same random stream of text... does this have any special meaning?

Z2: That... that is what I was trying to pass through last time we tried this. How is that even possible?

R takes a closer look at the screen. It reads:
"I w___not t_yi__ _ith a__eal co_n... I was u___g an a_p to gen___te coin-like re____s"

Z2: It must be an error, random data that you see meaning to... try running the loop again.

Z1 runs the loop starting from a known good point. Before selecting the point of stability, she looks at Z2 and R and they nod their approval.

"I w_s_n_t_t_y_n_ _ith a_r_a_ _o_n... I was u_i_g an a_p to g_n_r_t_ coin-like r_s_l_s"

R: And that is from the same input data?

J: This is great, even if the text had no meaning.

*Z1 and Z2 can't answer. They remain wide mouth.*

*R gets up from his post, checks windows and code and so on, on the prime node*

R: Yeah, same data, different results... you guys should come and see this.

*They all gather around the node*

J: Same input, different output, and no link to anything external, only the fractal seed.

R: Shall I run this again?

Y: Let me look at the code again?

*R shows the code window, scrolls down slowly for Y to look at it.*

Z2: I don't think it is a good idea if we run this again right now, which is why we should do it... *blinks and shakes head* whoa! We have been looking for something like this, for how long now?

*R prepares the running loops, and hovers mouse at 'execute'*

J: I am so excited!

Y: Yeah, let's see what it shows now.

*R looking at Z1 and Z2, waiting for their approval, Z2 nods. Z1 nods reluctantly. R clicks 'execute'*

"I_w_s_n_t_t_y_n_ _i_h_a_r_a_ _o_n_._ _ _a_ _s_n_ _n_a_p_t_ _e_e_a_e_c_i_-_i_e_r_s_l_s"

*R, J and Y check the results letter per letter, pointing and comparing over logs. Delaying their findings, buildup pressure/expectations to the audience*

Y: Same source, seems. Different filter... I think if we overlaid the results of all attempts we will get the original string, for what is worth.

Z2: We know the original string, but, yeah, let's do that.

X: Is this self contained?

R: Maybe, well, probably... why?

X: Nobody is checking on the second loop, we barely are keeping an eye out on the computers in this room.

C: I will go keep an eye on the other computers. Keep me updated.

*C leaves*

J: I should be looking at the computers here, or join her, but I want to see first hand.

A5: Alright, I'm going to help C.

Y: Overlaying the results at the source will take a while. We can understand the interpretations, we can run it like this again.

Z2: Yeah... let's do that. Zee, are you alright?

*Z1 Nods, eyes wide still*

*R prepares the modules, and hovers to 'execute again', gets the approving nods and clicks*

"__wa__no__tr__ng__it__a __al__oi__..__ w__ u__ng__n __p __ g__er__e __in__ik__re__lt__tl__er__ki__ni__ e__re__g __ p__ n__gn__u __w __..__io__la__ a__ti__gn__tr__on__aw__ wa__no__tr__ng__it__a __al__oi__..__ w__ u__ng__n __p __ g__er__e __in__ik__re__lt__tl__er__ki__ni__ e__re__g __ p__ n__gn__u __w __..__io__la__ a__ti__gn__tr__on__aw__ wa__no__tr__ng__it__a __al__oi__..__ w__ u__ng__n __p __ g__er__e __in__ik__re__lt__tl__er__ki__ni__ e__re__g __ p__ n__gn__u __w __..__io__la__ a__ti__gn__tr__on__aw__ wa__no__tr__ng__it__a __al__oi__..__ w__ u__ng__n __p __ g__er__e __in__ik__re__lt__tl__er__ki__ni__ e__re__g __ p__ n__gn__u __w __..__io__la__ a__ti__gn__tr__on__aw__ wa__no__tr__ng__it__a __al__oi__..__ w__ u__ng__n __p __ g__er__e __in__ik__re__lt__tl__er__ki__ni__ e__re__g __ p__ n__gn__u __w __..__io__la__ a__ti__gn__tr__on__aw__"

*The display fills in with text like that*

Y: What does it mean?

Z2: "I was not trying with a real coin... I was using an app to generate coin-like results"

*Y, perplexed, looking at Z2*

Z2: That was the text I was trying to send last time to Z1 in my instalink attempt.

Y: Right before the error happened?

Z2: Quite a few times that day, but yeah, right before the error happened also.

R: The first line, up to here *points at the 're__lt__tl__er'* is like the previous lines, but the unreadable characters clumping in doubles.

C: What is going on?

R: That came up as a loop, continuing the same output, reversed and re-reversed, going on and on, at what we can see... anything new over there?

C: Nope, same errors, same solutions. Not as often, but I guess because you are not trying as often over there either.

*V takes a look at all the displays, and goes fixes a couple of errors too: same here...

Y: Should we run this again?

Z1: I got a bad feeling about this.

R: We all have.

J: We are here because we are going against our natural instinct to run away.

X: I think we should try.

R: The cycles are still running, even if they are locked into repeat.

Y: By the way, good thinking to whoever thought it was a good idea to send individual characters instead of strings. If they were strings, we would not be able to see anything.

R: Thank you. We would have too much trouble decoding it, later, no way to do it in real time. Individual characters, dismissing them as nonsense or useful, we can handle during link experiments.

Y: I think we can try run a second code in parallel while the first is still running.

Z2: What's the point? It is cyclic and redundant now. We can stop the program.

R: I'm not sure... Who's up for a second loop, knowing we are dealing with a delicate situation that busy cpu cycles may not be able to replicate?

C: Second cycle, I think...

*V, shrugs*

R: And who is up for stopping this loop even if it is not finished?

Z1: What else is this loop good for?

Z2: This loop relates to both physics. As long as this is running, in a sense even the source divergence is still running, even if it is, in our past? I don't know. Maybe we can close the loop. We are not getting anything useful from it, and we can't keep it running forever anyway, so, what's the point?

Z1: I don't know... it is after all a realtime experiment.

Z2: Alright, second loop then.

R: Second loop it is. Any objections, please give them before I go through all the setup steps.

A5: I think the easiest solution would be to just stop and run again, but I don't have any other objection except ease.

Z1: Do we need to run this in all computers?

J: There are some minor adjustments that can be put, but the setup will answer as it is.

R: Not now. We will take it from the last good result coming from the network. The network will still need to validate and lookup the PiPrime tables as we run the loop, and it will accept any input.

*R setting up the experiment, Z1, Z2, X, Y and V looking at each other. J looking impatiently at the display, hinting R where to go next when he delays. R, occasionally 'thanx' to J*

R: ready! *pointer hovering over 'execute'*

Y: Now is a good time as any.

*R executes*

Display:
"I___s n___try___ wi___a r___ co___.. ___as ___ng ___app___ ge___ate___in-___e r___lts"

R: Clean cut, and related.

J: This... this is amazing... R, you were right. I was wasting time guiding M and my bunch towards aliens....

*computers turn off, all of them*
*exclaims of surprise and disbelief*

C: Error, error, error!! Spilling over, all computers now, all errors... what did you guys do? Do the same errors appear over there?

R: Everything turned off here!

Z1: Don't touch anything, yet!

Z2, looking around: Can't be a power cut. Not in all of them, and a synchronous power off of all batteries as well.

Y: Duh!

R: I... I don't know what to think... this is not usual for me... I need to clear my thoughts, I need to get through this... without confusion from more ideas.

*all starring at the computers*

C: Saving logs, pausing everything. Coming.

(scene ends, explanations to follow)



Scene036
(scene to be inserted into storyline at appropriate moment, allowing the audience to wonder along without getting the explanations ready yet, while not bored, following a different set of events in the story)
__________________________________

*Z2 shows briefly the phone to Z1*
R - text: Nothing in the power circuits, yet all processors exhibit low-level errors of the kind that make it impossible to even recognize a keyboard, let alone something as complex as a graphics card. The boards themselves are fine, once we swap processors.

Z2 - text: And the components not on the instalink source?

Z2 to Z1: He is saying all processors fried, and all boards are fine.

R - text: 14 hours of stress test, all perfect, in over half of combinations of hardware.

C - text: How come only those burst? Weren't all on the same programs?

Z2 giggles, to Z1: Clara still does not get we are not chasing inertial systems. She is not yet out of the first chapter. Who invited her in?

Z1: You did!

Z2: I know I know. I'm kidding.

R - text: Due to the insanity of having to follow emergent vortexes of individual atoms, we don't even try that anymore. If we did, maybe none of the processors would have burst, only the diverging world lines. As it stands, the averages fitting our memory buffers, relating to matter and vibrations in the immediate vicinity, imploded in forward time to what we saw. Why, and where did the extra energy come from, I can't say, yet.

X - text: If we did track individual atoms, after a couple of lifetimes of the universe needed to do it, everything would have burst, hahahaha!!

*Z2 giggles reading the text.*

Z1: Any luck with the logs?

Z2 types on the phone: Any luck with the logs?

R - text: Recovered everything prior to that glitchy moment, but everything behind is garbage, unreadable at base bit arrangements.

Z1 to Z2: No, seems.

Z2: We are the only witnesses of what happened? No logs to show for it?

Z1: If we exclude the secondary network, but that was a balance log, not a cause.

Z1: Where is Y with recovering the code combination for reuse?

Z2: Working with Jack on it. They think they got it, but it does not work, not even in realtime.

Z1: Realtime with fewer than 3 computers is not going to work anyway.

Z2: I think they can manage finding more computers, even ones they can risk burning. I think the problem is how that code relates to physics itself.

Z1: It still has no hint of e=mc2 in it.

Z2: As Ramis would say, it does not need to have it in a form you can see, but it has it. Definitely.

Z1: Yeah,,, all maths is connected. I know the song.

Z2: Please, don't get depressed now. We got so much more to do.

Z1: There is a glitchy moment in physics where the world ends into a loop we can read in a ping-pong of reverse-forward... I think I need my time to come to terms with it. I mean, we can read all the way backwards to the big bang from that moment, and inverse still till that cause of that moment a month back in our matching causal line, and forth till the burst of energy that diverged our stories, but they are frozen in time, unchanging, never knowing they are no longer part of the world.

Z2: That is if what that Ramis and his team hypothesize as explanation is true. Which, agreed, we were looking for, and maybe we got the scale of their effect wrong, but that is not the only explanation.

Z1: Which explanation would you go for? Manufacturer and technicians claiming power surges? With no traces on the board? But somehow accumulated over time, over the previous experiment, and burning all the processors at once. We were looking for it, and we found it! In our timeline it will of course manifest itself in some perfectly explainable in-world cause and effect, even as simple as a power surge. Can't go on explaining antibubbles and antiblackholes to most scientists let alone technicians and managers

Z2: True that... and these kinds of experiments cannot even be directly repeated at this level of preparation and understanding. Antiblackholes cannot exist in forward time, so they can't be contained and need to express themselves as radiating energy, but at slower than light vibration, or what we can assume as such if we wish to set an address for it, something to follow inside the fractals. We got unlucky at burning the processors, but that means we need to tune in better.

Z1: Among what freaks me out is our ability to read that whole branch of exception, or common occurrence if we are the exception.

Z2: We can't read it yet. We are working on it. And I don't think we ever will be able to read anything more than blips on specifically crafted devices already prepared by the collapsing branch. And we need your help and expertise to get there faster.

Z1 hugs pillow: You will have to do without me for a while. I can't handle it right now.

Z2: I understand. You need your time to fully accept what a part of you has been working hard into disproving just as a part of you has been working to prove. Don't worry, we'll be here, in this universe or the adjacent ones, *giggles*

*Z1 sighs* 

Z2: I'll get us something to eat... *takes out phone and orders from 'Baboon' in a few quick streamlined clicks shown to the audience*

Z2: Done... will be here in *watches sponsored wristwatch or time on sponsored smartphone* 15 minutes.

Z2 leaves phone by the camera, or not, a full long slow scene exposure while Z2 cuddles/encourages Z1, if there is a sponsor for this scene. Technical attention diverted to phone showing on the camera, and the human aspect distracted by the scene. Few words between Z1 and Z2.

(scene may continue)